Installment sales can be a great way to defer and sometimes actually reduce tax on the sale of property.  If certain requirements are met, a seller can report and pay tax on the profit from an installment sale as payments are received, rather than reporting and paying tax on all of the profit at the time of sale.  

However, be careful when a buyer assumes an existing loan on the property or takes a property “subject to” the loan in an installment sale because that can trigger taxable gain, even though you don’t receive any cash.  

If the amount of the loan exceeds your tax basis in the property, the excess of the loan assumed over the tax basis is treated as a payment received in the year of sale, which excess would all be taxable gain. In addition, all installment payments received thereafter would be 100% taxable gain.  

Example: Carl sells a property to Doug for a selling price of $1.6 million. The property is subject to a loan in the principal amount of $600,000. Doug will assume or take subject to the $600,000 loan and pay the remaining $1,000,000 in 10 equal annual installments together with interest. Carl’s basis in the property is $400,000. There are no selling expenses. In the year of the sale, Carl is deemed to have received payment of $200,000 ($600,000 loan assumed – $400,000 tax basis).  

In transactions like this, it would be advisable, if possible, to require payment of enough cash to satisfy any tax liability arising on the sale. 

Bottom Line:   Bottom line: If a buyer assumes a loan in the installment sale with a balance that exceeds your tax basis, you will have taxable gain in the year of sale, and 100% of the payments received in the future will be taxable.  

“You will find the key to success under the alarm clock.” – Benjamin Franklin

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of James Duffy James Duffy

Jim is a partner in Taft’s Tax practice and practices principally in the areas of federal tax law; tax credit financing; individual, partnership and corporate tax planning; M&A; tax-exempt organizations and general commercial and corporate law.

Jim has been actively practicing in the

Jim is a partner in Taft’s Tax practice and practices principally in the areas of federal tax law; tax credit financing; individual, partnership and corporate tax planning; M&A; tax-exempt organizations and general commercial and corporate law.

Jim has been actively practicing in the area of the New Markets Tax Credits (NMTC) program since its inception in 2001. He has organized community development entities (CDEs) and represented CDEs, borrowers and other parties in structuring and closing numerous NMTC transactions. Jim also advises clients regarding Qualified Opportunity Zone matters.

Jim advises LLCs, partnerships, corporations and individuals in connection with the formation of new companies, mergers and acquisitions, formation of joint ventures, like-kind exchanges, ownership succession planning, and general business operations. These clients are involved in a variety of industries, including banking, venture capital, real estate, construction, consulting and investing.

Jim also advises charitable and non-charitable tax-exempt organizations, including health care entities, schools, religious and civic organizations. In addition to advising management of these organizations with respect to matters pertaining to general operation and maintenance of tax-exempt status, Jim has assisted clients in forming, restructuring and dissolving tax-exempt organizations, as well as forming donor- advised funds.

Prior to joining the firm, Jim worked at the law firm of Lewis Rice and Fingersh in St. Louis, Missouri, where he concentrated his practice in federal and state taxation. He also clerked for the Hon. Robert P. Ruwe of the U.S. Tax Court in Washington, D.C.