We frequently deal with companies that would like to issue profits interest retroactively. The typical scenario is that the company intended to or agreed to issue profits interests to a service provider and for one reason or another the paperwork was never done and the profits interest was never issued. As a result, the service provider misses out on the appreciation in the value of the company that occurred during the intervening two or three (or however many) years.

While it is not possible to go back in time to grant that interest, a grant of a “catch-up profits interest“ is the next best thing. A catch-up profits interest provides for a priority distribution of profits to the service provider to catch them up for the missed appreciation.

For example, assume a service provider was supposed to receive a 1% profits interest three years ago and that if it had been issued at that time, the profits interest would be worth $300,000 currently. A catch-up profits interest could be issued which would provide that the first $300,000 of partnership profits (on a sale for example) would be distributed to the service provider and the remainder of the profits would be divided up in accordance with the partners’ percentage interests. (Technically, to receive a full 1% interest, the catch-up distribution would have to be $303,030 rather than $300,000.)

Assuming there is $300,000 of profit at the time of sale, the service provider is put in as a good a position as he or she would have been if the profits interest had been issued timely.

Bottom Line: While not perfect, a catch-up profits interest can be an effective way to deal with common scenario of the failure to issue an agreed-upon profits interest in a prior year.

If at first you don’t succeed, remove all evidence you ever tried. – David Brent

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of James Duffy James Duffy

Jim is a partner in Taft’s Tax practice and practices principally in the areas of federal tax law; tax credit financing; individual, partnership and corporate tax planning; M&A; tax-exempt organizations and general commercial and corporate law.

Jim has been actively practicing in the

Jim is a partner in Taft’s Tax practice and practices principally in the areas of federal tax law; tax credit financing; individual, partnership and corporate tax planning; M&A; tax-exempt organizations and general commercial and corporate law.

Jim has been actively practicing in the area of the New Markets Tax Credits (NMTC) program since its inception in 2001. He has organized community development entities (CDEs) and represented CDEs, borrowers and other parties in structuring and closing numerous NMTC transactions. Jim also advises clients regarding Qualified Opportunity Zone matters.

Jim advises LLCs, partnerships, corporations and individuals in connection with the formation of new companies, mergers and acquisitions, formation of joint ventures, like-kind exchanges, ownership succession planning, and general business operations. These clients are involved in a variety of industries, including banking, venture capital, real estate, construction, consulting and investing.

Jim also advises charitable and non-charitable tax-exempt organizations, including health care entities, schools, religious and civic organizations. In addition to advising management of these organizations with respect to matters pertaining to general operation and maintenance of tax-exempt status, Jim has assisted clients in forming, restructuring and dissolving tax-exempt organizations, as well as forming donor- advised funds.

Prior to joining the firm, Jim worked at the law firm of Lewis Rice and Fingersh in St. Louis, Missouri, where he concentrated his practice in federal and state taxation. He also clerked for the Hon. Robert P. Ruwe of the U.S. Tax Court in Washington, D.C.