Under the “partial disposition rule,” if you replace a roof (or other structural component in a building such as an elevator), you can claim a tax deduction equal to the remaining tax basis (undepreciated cost) of that roof you replaced.  You then capitalize the cost of the replacement roof, elevator or other component and begin to depreciate it. You must elect to use the partial disposition rule to take this deduction, but you make the election simply by claiming the loss on your tax return for the year and by beginning to depreciate the replacement roof. Without the partial replacement rule, you would need to continue to depreciate the old roof over its remaining useful life (in addition to depreciating the new roof). Obviously, the ability to take a loss for the old roof can significantly increase your deductions for the year of replacement.

There is another benefit to the partial disposition rule.  By deducting the loss on partial disposition rather than continuing to depreciate the property, you can reduce the tax rate from 25% to 20% on a portion of the gain from a sale of the property.  This is because the portion of gain taxable at 25% which is known as “unrecaptured 1250 gain” is equal to the amount of depreciation previously deducted for the property. The loss that you deduct under the partial disposition rule is not depreciation.  Consequently, any gain attributable to the reduction in basis from deducting that loss is not included in the unrecaptured section 1250 gain and is taxable at 20% rather than 25%.

Bottom Line:  By electing to use the partial disposition rule you can accelerate deductions with respect to structural components that you replace and potentially reduce the tax rate applicable to some of the gain on a subsequent sale of the property.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of James Duffy James Duffy

Jim is a partner in Taft’s Tax practice and practices principally in the areas of federal tax law; tax credit financing; individual, partnership and corporate tax planning; M&A; tax-exempt organizations and general commercial and corporate law.

Jim has been actively practicing in the

Jim is a partner in Taft’s Tax practice and practices principally in the areas of federal tax law; tax credit financing; individual, partnership and corporate tax planning; M&A; tax-exempt organizations and general commercial and corporate law.

Jim has been actively practicing in the area of the New Markets Tax Credits (NMTC) program since its inception in 2001. He has organized community development entities (CDEs) and represented CDEs, borrowers and other parties in structuring and closing numerous NMTC transactions. Jim also advises clients regarding Qualified Opportunity Zone matters.

Jim advises LLCs, partnerships, corporations and individuals in connection with the formation of new companies, mergers and acquisitions, formation of joint ventures, like-kind exchanges, ownership succession planning, and general business operations. These clients are involved in a variety of industries, including banking, venture capital, real estate, construction, consulting and investing.

Jim also advises charitable and non-charitable tax-exempt organizations, including health care entities, schools, religious and civic organizations. In addition to advising management of these organizations with respect to matters pertaining to general operation and maintenance of tax-exempt status, Jim has assisted clients in forming, restructuring and dissolving tax-exempt organizations, as well as forming donor- advised funds.

Prior to joining the firm, Jim worked at the law firm of Lewis Rice and Fingersh in St. Louis, Missouri, where he concentrated his practice in federal and state taxation. He also clerked for the Hon. Robert P. Ruwe of the U.S. Tax Court in Washington, D.C.