Content by Jim Duffy

As you may be aware, when a corporation files an election to be taxed as an S corporation, all of the shareholders must consent to that election. If you live in a community property state, your spouse may be an owner in the corporation, even if he or she does not actually own any stock by name. The income tax regulations provide that when a stock of corporation is owned by a husband and wife as community property, both persons must consent to the election.

Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Puerto Rico, Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin are community property states. In those states, property acquired by a spouse during marriage or with marital assets is treated as owned by both spouses. In that situation, your spouse must consent to the election in order for it to be valid. As one might expect, this could be an easy thing to miss.

Fortunately, the Treasury has provided a process to obtain automatic relief for failures to obtain spousal consent in these circumstances. In order to obtain this relief, the corporation must file a statement with the service center where it files its income tax return to the effect that it is seeking relief for late filing of the shareholder consent and stating that the community property spouses have reported all items of income, gain and loss consistent with the S corporation election.

Bottom Line: If you live in a community property state, remember to have your spouse consent to the S election even if he or she is not a shareholder in name. If you forget, however, there is an easy fix.

“If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses.”- Henry Ford

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of James Duffy James Duffy

Jim is a partner in Taft’s Tax practice and practices principally in the areas of federal tax law; tax credit financing; individual, partnership and corporate tax planning; M&A; tax-exempt organizations and general commercial and corporate law.

Jim has been actively practicing in the

Jim is a partner in Taft’s Tax practice and practices principally in the areas of federal tax law; tax credit financing; individual, partnership and corporate tax planning; M&A; tax-exempt organizations and general commercial and corporate law.

Jim has been actively practicing in the area of the New Markets Tax Credits (NMTC) program since its inception in 2001. He has organized community development entities (CDEs) and represented CDEs, borrowers and other parties in structuring and closing numerous NMTC transactions. Jim also advises clients regarding Qualified Opportunity Zone matters.

Jim advises LLCs, partnerships, corporations and individuals in connection with the formation of new companies, mergers and acquisitions, formation of joint ventures, like-kind exchanges, ownership succession planning, and general business operations. These clients are involved in a variety of industries, including banking, venture capital, real estate, construction, consulting and investing.

Jim also advises charitable and non-charitable tax-exempt organizations, including health care entities, schools, religious and civic organizations. In addition to advising management of these organizations with respect to matters pertaining to general operation and maintenance of tax-exempt status, Jim has assisted clients in forming, restructuring and dissolving tax-exempt organizations, as well as forming donor- advised funds.

Prior to joining the firm, Jim worked at the law firm of Lewis Rice and Fingersh in St. Louis, Missouri, where he concentrated his practice in federal and state taxation. He also clerked for the Hon. Robert P. Ruwe of the U.S. Tax Court in Washington, D.C.