As you probably know, in a like-kind exchange, any sale proceeds that you do not apply to purchasing a new investment property will be taxable (up to the total gain on the property). The challenge with making a like-kind exchange of property in a seller-financed sale is that the seller doesn’t receive any (or very little) cash at closing.  As a result, even if the seller rolls that cash over into a new property, subsequent payments received on the note will be taxable (to the extent of gain). The question is, how can a seller get cash (instead of the seller’s note) to the qualified intermediary (QI) so the QI can fully reinvest the sale proceeds into the new property.

One approach may be for the seller to purchase the note from the QI for cash. For example, if a seller sold a property for $100,000 with $20,000 cash at closing plus a note for $80,000, the seller could buy the note from the QI for $80,000, leaving the QI with $100,000 cash to use to purchase the replacement property. (The buyer of the note would have a tax basis in the note equal to the amount paid for it, so the receipt of subsequent payments on the note would not be taxable except to the extent of interest received).

Coming up with cash to buy the note may, of course, be easier said than done.  Does the seller have the cash? Will a lender be willing to loan the seller that cash? Is there a third party that would be willing to purchase the note? As the numbers get larger, this may become more challenging. 

If the property sold is subject to existing debt, and the replacement property is purchased in part with seller financing, this complicates the analysis somewhat but doesn’t change the ultimate result. On the positive side, the third-party debt may reduce the amount of the buyer note payable to the seller and, therefore, reduce the amount of cash that would be needed to buy the note.

Bottom Line:  While the need for cash may make this a challenging structure, there may be an opportunity to defer gain on seller-financed property in a Section 1031 exchange.

 “When you’re in jail, a good friend will be trying to bail you out. A best friend will be in the cell next to you saying, ‘Damn, that was fun.’” —Groucho Marx

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of James Duffy James Duffy

Jim is a partner in Taft’s Tax practice and practices principally in the areas of federal tax law; tax credit financing; individual, partnership and corporate tax planning; M&A; tax-exempt organizations and general commercial and corporate law.

Jim has been actively practicing in the

Jim is a partner in Taft’s Tax practice and practices principally in the areas of federal tax law; tax credit financing; individual, partnership and corporate tax planning; M&A; tax-exempt organizations and general commercial and corporate law.

Jim has been actively practicing in the area of the New Markets Tax Credits (NMTC) program since its inception in 2001. He has organized community development entities (CDEs) and represented CDEs, borrowers and other parties in structuring and closing numerous NMTC transactions. Jim also advises clients regarding Qualified Opportunity Zone matters.

Jim advises LLCs, partnerships, corporations and individuals in connection with the formation of new companies, mergers and acquisitions, formation of joint ventures, like-kind exchanges, ownership succession planning, and general business operations. These clients are involved in a variety of industries, including banking, venture capital, real estate, construction, consulting and investing.

Jim also advises charitable and non-charitable tax-exempt organizations, including health care entities, schools, religious and civic organizations. In addition to advising management of these organizations with respect to matters pertaining to general operation and maintenance of tax-exempt status, Jim has assisted clients in forming, restructuring and dissolving tax-exempt organizations, as well as forming donor- advised funds.

Prior to joining the firm, Jim worked at the law firm of Lewis Rice and Fingersh in St. Louis, Missouri, where he concentrated his practice in federal and state taxation. He also clerked for the Hon. Robert P. Ruwe of the U.S. Tax Court in Washington, D.C.