First of all, you may be thinking, “Why would you ever want to do that?” Sometimes in transactions (such as a merger or acquisition), it is desirable to have management exchange otherwise vested equity for equity that vests over time in order to retain the key individuals. Aside from the obvious business considerations, the first thought that would likely occur to the holder of the equity is that this arrangement would convert the capital gain inherent in the equity to ordinary income. Obviously, this is undesirable since ordinary income is taxed at a substantially higher rate than capital gains. However, by making a Section 83(b) election, the capital gains treatment can be preserved.

Usually, when equity is subject to vesting restrictions, the service provider realizes ordinary income at the time the equity vests. Taxpayers can elect under Section 83(b) to include in income the excess of the fair market value of the unvested equity over the amount paid for that equity in the year in which it is received. Accordingly, assuming that the unvested stock received in exchange for the vested stock has the same value, there is no excess of the fair market value over the amount paid (i.e., the value of the stock given up), so there is no income to report. The fact that the transferee paid full value for the property received does not preclude the ability to make an 83(b) election.

Often, the vested equity exchanged for the unvested equity will have appreciated in value over the amount paid for it or previously included in income. This creates the potential for accelerating taxation of the gain inherent in the vested equity upon the exchange. This
would need to be carefully evaluated in a taxable exchange. However, tax on gain will not be accelerated if the exchange occurs in the context of a non-taxable transaction, such as a tax-free reorganization, a rollover of equity in a partnership, or an exchange of stock or partnership interests of one class for stock or partnership interests of another class in the same corporation or partnership.

Bottom Line: An 83(b) election can prevent converting capital gain to ordinary income when the exchange of unvested equity for vested equity is a desirable strategy.

“By trying we can easily learn to endure adversity- another man’s, I mean.” – Mark Twain

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of James Duffy James Duffy

Jim is a partner in Taft’s Tax practice and practices principally in the areas of federal tax law; tax credit financing; individual, partnership and corporate tax planning; M&A; tax-exempt organizations and general commercial and corporate law.

Jim has been actively practicing in the

Jim is a partner in Taft’s Tax practice and practices principally in the areas of federal tax law; tax credit financing; individual, partnership and corporate tax planning; M&A; tax-exempt organizations and general commercial and corporate law.

Jim has been actively practicing in the area of the New Markets Tax Credits (NMTC) program since its inception in 2001. He has organized community development entities (CDEs) and represented CDEs, borrowers and other parties in structuring and closing numerous NMTC transactions. Jim also advises clients regarding Qualified Opportunity Zone matters.

Jim advises LLCs, partnerships, corporations and individuals in connection with the formation of new companies, mergers and acquisitions, formation of joint ventures, like-kind exchanges, ownership succession planning, and general business operations. These clients are involved in a variety of industries, including banking, venture capital, real estate, construction, consulting and investing.

Jim also advises charitable and non-charitable tax-exempt organizations, including health care entities, schools, religious and civic organizations. In addition to advising management of these organizations with respect to matters pertaining to general operation and maintenance of tax-exempt status, Jim has assisted clients in forming, restructuring and dissolving tax-exempt organizations, as well as forming donor- advised funds.

Prior to joining the firm, Jim worked at the law firm of Lewis Rice and Fingersh in St. Louis, Missouri, where he concentrated his practice in federal and state taxation. He also clerked for the Hon. Robert P. Ruwe of the U.S. Tax Court in Washington, D.C.